Skip to content
A black-and-white photo of a courtroom door with 'MCOCA Court' written in bold letters.Photo via The Free Press Journal

Tiger Shroff Case: Court Orders Age Verification For Accused Shooter After Lawyer Claims He’s a Minor

The Tiger Shroff case just got more complicated. Not because of the shooting — but because of the shooter’s age.

By Call Sheet1 min read

In this story

The Tiger Shroff shooting case has taken a legal twist after Mumbai’s special MCOCA court ordered police to verify the age of Phool Singh Kumar, one of the 12 accused in the alleged October 18, 2026, incident. The court directed the investigating officer to determine whether Kumar was under 18 at the time of the alleged firing — a claim his defence team has formally raised.

Kumar’s lawyers, Sidhant Mor and Divyam Gaur, submitted a Haryana-issued birth certificate and an Aadhaar card both listing November 30, 2008, as his date of birth. That would make him just 17 years and 10 months old during the alleged attack, potentially qualifying him for juvenile justice protections under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act.

The defence argued that he should not be held in adult custody and requested transfer to a safe facility under juvenile law. But the public prosecutor opposed the plea, and the court rejected the immediate request for such a move. Special Judge Satyanarayan Navandar acknowledged the application but stressed that the issue wasn’t raised earlier, not during transit remand in Sonipat, nor in prior appearances before the Mumbai magistrate or the MCOCA court.

The defence countered that Kumar had been pressured by police not to disclose his age. The court then instructed police to verify the documents and submit a report within 15 days. Until then, Kumar remains in police custody, along with the other accused. The rest of the suspects have been remanded to judicial custody.

No further details on the investigation, forensic evidence, or timeline have emerged. The next step is the verification report, and only after that will the court decide whether Kumar’s status changes. The outcome could reshape the entire legal trajectory of the case.

Reported from

This article was written by the CutMirchi desk from the reporting above. Facts are attributed to their original publishers.

What did you make of it?

Be the first to comment

Join the argument. No password, just your email or a passkey.

    Read next