Skip to content
Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson in a promotional still for the Apple TV+ series BrothersPhoto via The Hollywood Reporter

McConaughey And Harrelson's Brothers Divides Critics At Apple TV

The sitcom leans entirely on the real-life friendship between its stars, and reviewers can't agree on whether that's enough to carry eight episodes.

By Reel to Reel2 min read

In this story

Current hype level64

Live site hype

around 2 reading right now ยท 137 today

Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson are back on screen together for the first time since the first season of True Detective, and this time they're playing versions of themselves who might actually be brothers.

Brothers, streaming now on Apple TV+, opens with a title card describing its premise as based on "a true rumor". As both Collider and The Hollywood Reporter note, the show springs from an actual anecdote, that McConaughey's mother once suggested to Harrelson she'd known his father, which sparked years of jokes about the two friends sharing blood. The series turns that into a plot. In it, Ma Mac (Holland Taylor) lets the secret slip while drunk, then walks it back the next morning, sending Harrelson's character down a rabbit hole of DNA tests and old family history while McConaughey's character tries to run a political campaign without the whole thing blowing up around him.

Both reviews agree the show is watchable largely because the two leads are watchable. Beyond that, the critical consensus falls apart.

Two very different verdicts

Collider's review calls Brothers "anchored by the charm of its two leads" and says the format works as "a light antidote to more serious streaming fare", even while conceding it borrows a familiar sitcom blueprint, one friend upends the other's orderly life, and never really pushes past that. The Hollywood Reporter is far less forgiving, describing the series as full of "endless perfunctory bickering and bouts of limp farce" and comparing the whole exercise to Robert Redford and Paul Newman making a film about how much fun they'd had shooting Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.

The credits list McConaughey and Harrelson as creators alongside David West Read and Lee Eisenberg, with THR reporting that Eisenberg came aboard as showrunner and replaced Read late in production, something it says shows in the finished season's uneven tone.

Holland Taylor comes out of both reviews as the standout, playing Ma Mac as, in Collider's words, "hard-drinking, foul-mouthed, gun-toting, and absolutely delightful". Lisa Gilroy, as McConaughey's ruthless campaign manager, gets singled out by both outlets too, with THR saying she plays like she's "stealing every scene" despite seeming to have wandered in from another show entirely. Natalie Martinez and Brittany Ishibashi play the two men's wives, and the show's teenage kids get pulled into a subplot involving a flirtation between Harrelson's daughter and McConaughey's son that both reviews suggest is meant to unsettle without going too far.

What nobody disputes is the central gimmick. McConaughey plays a folksy, monologuing version of himself who Harrelson at one point describes as looking "like a belt buckle come to life". Harrelson plays a weed-smoking, van-dwelling hippie freaked out by his own household of women. It's the two actors leaning hard into how the public already sees them, and whether that's enough depends entirely on how much goodwill you're bringing to the screen with you.

Eight episodes are out now on Apple TV+. Whether a second season answers the show's central question, are they actually related, remains, per Collider, entirely up in the air.

Reported from

This article was written by the CutMirchi desk from the reporting above. Facts are attributed to their original publishers.

What did you make of it?

Be the first to comment

Join the argument. No password, just your email or a passkey.

    Read next